data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f223/3f223b6dc87c6404ad7510abda4a170351848e8c" alt=""
Anyway, growing up, I had a pretty positive impression of gifted children, which I realize now is inherently incomplete and also grossly inaccurate. While I came out of it with the impression of incredible smarts and the ability to rules-lawyer out of anything... the notion of anything relating to overexcitabilities was left well behind - as was the notion that perhaps gifted is not something that is global. Like, just because you're gifted doesn't mean you're as ridiculously strong in math as you are in language arts.
Then came my adult reading. I've learned that I assign my own personality to characters I read about - if a character's brainpower is never mentioned, I assume it matches my own. This has a habit of coloring how I look at my books anymore - particularly if there's a large discrepancy between the two, the most recent example being Sookie Stackhouse from the Southern Vampire Mysteries series. That was a hell of a disappointment, that one. But, I digress.
As I got into more books and characters in the last couple years, looking for good read-alouds for Mad Natter, there were more. Characters like Hermione Granger and Artemis Fowl. Brilliant, but intrinsically flawed... and again, no evidence of any real overexcitabilities - the intellect part of the package alone. Occasionally, the imaginative OE comes into play, though only when it's plot-appropriate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa577/fa5779a97fe2174e993d0efca7dbb11951f11d40" alt=""
It's no wonder we're fighting this battle. The gifted are either to be mocked, or have an incredible intellect, with no drawbacks whatsoever. Over, and over, and over again, this is what media is telling us - is it any wonder that our culture, as a whole, believes it?
This post has been a part of the GHF Blog Hop on being Gifted in Reel Life. Please click here for more blogs in this hop!
No comments:
Post a Comment